Morson Taylor Research Grant

Applications open February 2018

About
Policy AP372
Honour Roll
The Morson Taylor Research Grant was established following generous donations to the Emergency Medicine Research Foundation by the late Mrs Elisabeth Morson and Mrs Nairne Taylor. The grant is designed to foster a high quality research project in emergency medicine being undertaken by a Fellow or trainee of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and is overseen by the ACEM Foundation. A grant of up to $10,000 is offered and the project is to be completed within 24 months.
1. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The Morson Taylor Research Grant (the ‘grant’) was established in 1999 following generous donations by the late Mrs Elisabeth Morson and Mrs Nairne Taylor.  Its purpose is to foster high-quality research in emergency medicine by supporting particular research programs through the provision of monetary funding through the ACEM Foundation.
 
2. BODY OF POLICY

2.1 Nature of Grant
The grant consists of a monetary sum, the amount of which is fixed periodically by the ACEM Foundation.

2.2 Eligibility Criteria
The grant is open to Fellows or trainees of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM/the College).

Fellows and trainees must be of good standing with the College.

2.3 Applications
Eligible persons interested in applying for the grant should complete the appropriate application form and submit it, together with the documentation specified therein, to the ACEM Foundation within the advertised timeframe.

2.4 Selection Process
A panel of three (3) or more assessors convened by the Scientific Committee shall adjudicate the applications and recommend to the ACEM Foundation a recipient of the grant, based on the following criteria:

• the originality of the research (5)
• its potential application to emergency medicine (5)
• the level of evidence provided by the outcome (5)
• appropriateness of the study methodology (5)
• its probability of success (5)
Maximum total score (25)

The ACEM Foundation shall determine the recipient of the grant. The decision of the Foundation will be final and no correspondence will be entered into.

All parts of the selection process must be conducted in accordance with the College Conflict of Interest Policy.

2.5 Acknowledgement of Grant
The winner of the grant is presented with a citation in acknowledgement of the grant at the College Ceremony held in the year the grant is made.

2.6 Publication of the Grant
The ACEM Foundation may publish the recipient’s name and the working title of the project to promote the grant and raise the profile of the ACEM Foundation.

3. CONDITIONS OF GRANT

3.1 General
(a) ‘Recipient’ means the person or persons to whom the funds in question were made available. Where more than one person is the joint recipient of funds, a reference to the ‘recipient’ includes a reference to all those recipients.

(b) The recipient of a grant and any research, technical or other personnel involved in the grant project are not employees of ACEM.  The College takes no responsibility whatsoever for any employment or other entitlements in respect of those parties.

3.2 Adherence to terms of project
The recipient shall adhere to the details of the research project and budget as approved by the College, and shall not make any alteration to either without the prior written approval of the College.

3.3 Completion of Grant
An approved project is to be completed within 24 months of the date the grant was made, or within such other timeframe as the ACEM Foundation may in writing allow.

3.4 Grant Funds
(a) The sums awarded will usually be paid in a lump sum as soon as practicable after the grant is made. They are not subject to inflationary or other incremental adjustments.

(b) When a grant terminates (for any reason), any unexpended balance of grant funds must be returned to the ACEM Foundation.

3.5 Matters requiring prior approval
(a) The recipient must obtain the prior express, written approval of the ACEM Foundation in respect of the following:

• changes to research program or budget
• approval to apply for patent
• approval to purchase office equipment with grant funds.

(b) Applications for prior approval must be made in writing, addressed to the ACEM Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and include full details of the subject matter.

(c) Any approval will not be valid if it is not made in writing or does not specify the precise nature of, and limitations on, the approval.

3.6 Required notifications
The recipient shall notify the ACEM Foundation in writing, and in advance wherever possible, of:

• any periods of absence to be taken during the course of the grant (excluding those which are less than four week’s duration)
• their leaving, or intention to leave,  the relevant institution before the expiration of the grant and the name of the institution their next intended place of employment.

3.7 Ethics
(a) It is expected that any research conducted with the support of a research grant:

• will have all necessary ethical clearances, and
• in particular, will comply with policies and statements on research involving humans published by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC).

(b) Recipients shall also comply with all relevant procedures and policies of the host institution.

3.8 Obligations

(a) Reporting Obligations
The recipient shall provide the following reports to the ACEM Foundation:

(i) by 30 May of each year – a statement of expenditure charged to the grant (provided by the host institution)

(ii) by 30 June of each year – a concise summary of research progress (approximately 300 words)

(iii) at the termination of the grant –

• a final statement of expenditure (provided by the host institution)
• a final report on the overall outcome of the research.

(b) Publication Obligations

At the termination of the grant, the recipient shall present the results of their work supported by the grant through:

(i) presentation at the ACEM Annual Scientific Meeting, Winter Symposium or other appropriate scientific meeting approved by the ACEM Foundation, or

(ii) publication through the usual scientific channels.

All presentations or publications are to acknowledge the support of the Morson Taylor Research Grant and the ACEM Foundation.

3.9 Intellectual Property
 Any discovery arising out of work supported by the grant must not be the subject of application for patent, except with:

• the written approval of ACEM Board, and
•  the agreement of the institution in which the work is carried out.

3.10 Ownership and disposition of property
(a) Equipment of any kind purchased from grant funds remains the property of ACEM.  With the prior approval of ACEM, the grant recipient may transfer or donate such equipment to another approved project or relevant institution.

(b) ACEM may arrange or direct removal or transfer of equipment between laboratories:

• at any time after completion of the original research projects, or
• at such time as, in the opinion of ACEM, the equipment is no longer required for the purposes of the project.

3.11 Prohibited usage of funds
Grant funds may not be used to acquire office equipment such as personal computers, laptop computers, tablets, smart phones, facsimile machines, photocopiers etc unless the recipient has obtained, in writing, the prior express approval of the ACEM Foundation.

3.12 Termination of Grant
(a) An grant may be terminated if the conditions of grant are not observed.

(b) A grant will terminate if the recipient leaves the institution before the expiration of the grant, unless other arrangements satisfactory to the ACEM Foundation are made beforehand.

4. ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS
• AP373 Morson Taylor Grant application form
• AP385 Morson Taylor Grant score sheet
P02 Policy on Standard Terminology
COR139 Conflict of Interest Policy

5. DOCUMENT REVIEW
Timeframe for review: every two (2) years, or earlier if required.

5.1 Responsibilities
Document authorisation: ACEM Board
Document implementation: ACEM Foundation / Scientific Committee
Document maintenance: ACEM Foundation & Faculties Coordinator
Morson Taylor Research Grant
Year Awarded to Title of Paper
2016 Anselm Wong The NACSTOP trial: A multicentre, cluster-controlled pilot trial investigating the early cessation of N-acetylcysteine in paracetamol overdose
2015 Michaela Mee A multicenter randomised placebo controlled trial of antiemetic agents in adult emergency department patients
2013 David Taylor IV midazolam-droperidol (combination), droperidol (only) or olanzapine (only) for the acutely agitated patient: multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial
2012 Simon Craig A randomised double-blind controlled trial of lignocaine / phenylephrine nasal spray vs placebo for pain and distress of nasogastric tube insertion in children
2011 David Taylor Best-practice pain management in the ED; a multi-centre, controlled, intervention trial
2010 David Taylor A simple target to change clinical practice in pain management
2009 Diana Egerton-Warburton A Randomised Placebo Controlled Trial of Antiemetic Agents in Adult Emergency Department Patients with Nausea or Vomiting
2008 Ann-Maree Kelly Determining the value of intermediate troponin values with respect to short and medium-term prognosis
2007 David Taylor IV olanzapine as an adjunct to midazolam for the acutely agitated ED patient: a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial
2006 Martyn Harvey Can Beta Blocker toxicity be ameliorated with intralipid infusion?
2005 Geoff Isbister A Randomized Controlled Trial of Hot Water (45oC) Immersion versus Ice Packs for Chironex Fleckeri Stings
2004 Victoria Brazil Using human patient simulation technology to access emergency physician’s cognitive performance
2003 Jonathan Knott Randomised clinical trial comparing droperidol and midazolam for sedation of the acutely agitated patient in the Emergency Department
2003 Peter Barnett Trial of inhaled methoxyflurane and nitrous oxide for painful procedures in children
2002 Kevin Chu Magnesium sulphate versus placebo for new onset atrial fibrillation – a randomised controlled trial
2001 Debra O’Brien The No Pain Study: intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine for the management of acute pain in an Emergency Department setting
2000 Stephen Priestley Topical local anaesthetic application to wounds in children. Does application at the time of triage reduce total treatment time in the emergency department?